Smart contract
code review
Token Security Audit
Launching a token without a security audit is like deploying software without testing. We provide independent analysis of token projects, covering smart contract code, economic model, on-chain data, and regulatory compliance.
Why token security audit?
Smart contracts are immutable programs managing user funds. A single bug can cause irreversible loss. There is no helpdesk to reverse a blockchain transaction. Vulnerabilities in smart contracts have led to losses of hundreds of millions of dollars (The DAO: $60M, Ronin Bridge: $625M, Wormhole: $320M).
Beyond code, token projects carry economic and regulatory risks. Unrestricted minting dilutes value, excessive token concentration enables rug pulls, and non-compliance with EU's MiCA regulation can result in sanctions.
xcactus provides token audits aligned with industry standards (OWASP SCSTG, SWC Registry, NIST SP 800-115), producing reports recognized across the Web3 ecosystem.
Token audit statistics 🔍
audit modules
6
🔍 6
vulnerability classes checked
37+
🛡️ 37+
supported networks
2
⛓️ 2
Every token tells a story on-chain.
We verify if it matches the promises.
We verify if it matches the promises.
Audit modules
Smart Contract Security (SC): code review, vulnerability scanning, standard compliance
Tokenomics Analysis (TE): supply mechanics, distribution, vesting, ICO/IDO mechanisms
On-Chain Verification (OC): fund flow tracing, DEX liquidity analysis, corporate registry check
MiCA Compliance (MC): EU regulation 2023/1114, white paper requirements, marketing review
Whitepaper Verification (WP): claim-by-claim comparison with code and on-chain data
Penetration Testing (PT): web app, API, Web3 integration, business logic attacks
Tools & Standards
Slither
Mythril
Echidna
OWASP
Solidity
Offered services
Comprehensive audit services covering the full lifecycle of token security assessment, from initial code review to remediation support.
Tokenomics & economic model analysis
On-chain data verification
Regulatory compliance assessment
Penetration testing (web + Web3)
Scoring methodology
Each finding is classified by severity
- CRITICAL - immediate threat to funds or control
- HIGH - serious security or financial risk
- MEDIUM - significant deviation from best practices
- LOW - minor issues or suboptimal implementation
- INFO - observations and recommendations
Final score across four dimensions
- Documentation 15%
- Code Quality 25%
- Architecture 25%
- Security 35%
Final result (1-10)
- PASS (8+)
- PASS WITH RESERVATIONS (5-7.9)
- FAIL (<5)
Ready to
work with us?
work with us?
Explore possibilities
book a meeting
Contact Us